Effects of Formative Self-Assessment on Thai Students’ English Language Proficiency

Main Article Content

Patcharee Imsri
Suttida Sangpoom

Abstract

This study aimed to gain more understanding of Thai EFL students’ self-assessment during practice test engagement. The participants were 95 Thai undergraduate students majoring in English at a public university in Thailand.   The correlation and multiple regression analyses were employed to study the relationship between the practice test and English language proficiency test (TOEIC) scores. The analysis of the confusion matrix was also performed to measure the accuracy of students’ self-assessment from the practice tests. The findings revealed that while Thai EFL students perceived themselves as “poor performers” for grammar and listening skill, their self-perception for vocabulary improvement was positive. A significant correlation was also found between the vocabulary practice test and the English proficiency test scores. The completion of multiple practice tests enhanced the students’ vocabulary knowledge and enabled them to improve their English proficiency test score.  Finally, the confusion matrix results revealed the accuracy for students’ self-perception of grammar and listening skill. They did not overestimate or underestimate their abilities, but accurately predicted themselves as “low achievers” for these two skills. As demonstrated in the findings, students are the key factors for their learning success. It is essential to engage them with their own learning process, so that they will be able to identify their strengths and weaknesses in learning.

Article Details

Section
Research articles

References

Alderson, C. J., & Huhta, A. (2005). The development of a suite of computer-based diagnostic tests based on the Common European Framework. Language Testing, 22(3), 301-320.

Alqahtani, M. (2015). The importance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education, III(3), 21-34.

Andrade, H. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In H. Andrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of Formative Assessment (pp. 90-105). New York, NY: Routledge.

Andrade, H. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. Frontiers in Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087

Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577544

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Blue, G.M. (1988). Self-assessment: The limits of learner independence. In A. Brooks & P. Grundy (Eds.), Individualization and autonomy in language learning: ELT document 131 (pp. 100-118). Hong Kong: Modern English Publications / British Council.

Boston, C. (2002). The concept of formative assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(1),9. https://doi.org/10.7275/kmcq-dj31

Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing learning through self-assessment. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315041520

Boud, D. (2003). Enhancing learning through self-assessment. London: Routledge Falmer, Taylor & Francis Group.

Bourke, R. (2014). Self-assessment in professional programmes within tertiary institutions. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(8), 908-918.

Bullock, D. (2011). Learner self-assessment: An investigation into teachers’ beliefs. ELT Journal, 65(2), 114-125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq041

Butler, Y. G., & Lee, J. (2010). The effects of self-assessment among young learners of English. Language Testing, 27(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209346370

Carpenter, S. K. (2023). Encouraging students to use retrieval practice: A review of emerging research from five types of interventions. Educational Psychology Review, 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09811-8

Carpenter, S.K., Pashler, H., & Vul, E. (2006). What types of learning are enhanced by a cued recall test? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(5), 826-830. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194004

Cogliano, M. C., Kardash, C. A. M., & Bernacki, M. L., (2019). The effects of retrieval practice and prior topic knowledge on test performance and confidence judgments, 56, 117-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.12.001

Dhanarattigannon, J., & Thienpermpool, P. (2022). EFL tertiary learners’ perceptions of self-assessment on writing in English. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(2), 521-545. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/index

Dickinson, L. (1978). Autonomy, self-directed learning and individualization. In A. Brooks & P. Grundy (Eds.), Individualization and autonomy in language learning: ELT document 131 (pp. 7-28). Hong Kong: Modern English Publications and the British Council.

Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. R. (2015). Formative assessment and writing. Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 523-547. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/681947

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.

Hosseini, M., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2021). Self-assessment in English language teaching and learning in the current decade (2010-2020): A systematic review. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 11(6), 854-872. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2021.116066

Karakoç, D., & Köse, G. D. (2017). The impact of vocabulary knowledge on reading, writing and proficiency scores of EFL learners. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 352-378.

Karaman, P. (2021). The impact of self-assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 7(4), 1151–1166. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.2344

Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger III, H. L. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? Memory, 17(4), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210802647009

Kavaliauskienė, G. (2004). Quality assessment in teaching English for specific purposes. English for Specific Purposes World, 3, 8-17.

Killimangalam, A. (2020). Student self-assessment: boon or bane? Teacher, 14(2), 30-33.

Konchiab, S., & Munpanya, P. (2021). Investigating Thai EFL undergraduates’ oral presentation performances and experiences, using teacher and student self-assessments. THAITESOL JOURNAL, 34(1), 96–117.

Kostons, D., van Gog. T., & Paas, F. (2012). Training self-assessment and task-selection skills: A cognitive approach to improving self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 121-132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.004

Kuncel, N. R., Crede, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 63-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543075001063

Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307-322.

Lev, J. (1949). The point biserial coefficient of correlation. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 20(1), 125-126.

Little, D. (2011). Learner autonomy, self-assessment and language tests: Towards a new assessment culture. In B. B. Morrison (Ed.), Independent language learning: Building on experience, seeking new perspectives (pp. 25-39). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

Lopez, R., & Kossack, S. (2007). Effects of recurring use of self-assessment in university courses. International Journal of Learning, 14(4), 203-216.

Luque, A., Carrasco, A., Martin, A., & de Las Heras, A. (2019). The impact of class imbalance in classification performance metrics based on the binary confusion matrix. Pattern Recognition, 91, 216-231.

Mahdavinia, M., & Ahmadi, L. N. (2011). Portfolio Assessment: A tool for self-directed learning at post-secondary level. In D. Gardner (Ed.), Fostering Learner Autonomy in Language Learning (pp. 76-89). Gaziantep: Zirve University.

Martin, S., English, T., Morley, L., O’Keefe-Quinn, T., & Whitfield, P. (2020). Practice tests improve performance, increase engagement and protect from psychological distress. Proceedings from International Conference on Higher Education Advances, 2020-June, 811–818. https://doi.org/10.4995/HEAd20.2020.11151

Mazloomi, S., & Khabiri, M. (2016). The impact of self-assessment on language learners’ writing skill.Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(1), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1214078

Meebangsai, D., Pongtin, P., Kitipoontanakorn, P., & Laosrirattanachai, P. (2023). Investigating proficiency of academic English in student writing: A comparative case study on vocabulary utilization in student research article writing visà-vis national and international research. PASAA, 67(1), 66-100.

Milton, J. (2013). Measuring the contribution of vocabulary knowledge to proficiency in the four skills. In C. Bardel, C. Lindquist, & B. Laufer (Eds), L2 vocabulary acquisition, knowledge and use: New perspectives on assessment and corpus analysis (pp. 57-78). Eurosla Monographs Series, 2.

Murakami, C., Valvona, C., & Broudy, D. (2012). Turning apathy into activeness in oral communication classes: Regular self- and peer-assessment in a TBLT programme. System, 40(3), 407-420.

Naujoks, N., Harder, B. & Händel, M. (2022). Testing pays off twice: Potentials of practice tests and feedback regarding exam performance and judgment accuracy. Metacognition Learning, 17, 479-498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09295-x

Ndoye, A. (2017). Peer/self-assessment and student learning. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(2), 255-269.

Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

OECD/CERI. (2008). Proceedings from International Conference Learning in the 21st Century: Research, Innovation and Policy. Retrieved from https://www.csuchico.edu/futurepossibilities/_assets/documents/oecd-21st-century-learning-40554299.pdf

Pan, S. C., Dunlosky, J., Xu, K. M., & Ouwehand, K. (2024). Emerging and future directions in test-enhanced learning research. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09857-2

Panadero, E., Brown, G. T. L., & Strijbos, J. W. (2015). The future of student self-assessment: A review of known unknowns and potential directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 803-830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2

Piamsai, C. (2023). Development and use of CEFR based self-assessment in a Thai tertiary context article information. PASAA Journal, 66(1), 81-126.

Ramdass, D., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Effects of self-correction strategy training on middle school students’ self-efficacy, self-evaluation, and mathematics division learning. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20(1), 18-41. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2008-869

Rea, P. R. (1981). Formative assessment of student performance: The role of self-appraisal. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7, 66-68.

Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249-255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x

Sanchez, C. E., Atkinson, K. M., Koenka, A. C., Moshontz, H., & Cooper, H. (2017). Self- grading and peer- grading for formative and summative assessments in 3rd through 12th grade classrooms: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(8), 1049–1066.

Sapsirin S. (2014). Self-assessment of business English writing ability of Thai university students: Criterion-related validity and gender differences. NIDA Journal of Language and Communication, 19(22), 77–91.

Seenak, P., & Adunyarittigun, D. (2019). Effects of self- and peer-assessments on Thai EFL students’ intonation learning. Social Science Journal, 8(1), 1–15.

Shelton-Strong, S. J. (2018). Fostering the development of language learner autonomy through Peer and self-Assessment. Relay Journal, 1(1), 21-46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37237/relay/010103

Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 72-101.

Suwanarak, K. (2018). Self-evaluation of Thai adult learners in English writing practice. In 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 24(2), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2402-08

Waikato Institute of Education. (2013). TOEIC® test scores and what they mean. Retrieved from https://www.wie.ac.nz/TOEICconversion.htm

Wang, T., & Rajprasit, K. (2015). Identifying affirmative beliefs about English language learning: Self-perceptions of Thai learners with different language proficiency. English Language Teaching, 8(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n4p1

Wangsotorn, A. (1981). Self-assessment in English skills by undergraduate and graduate students in Thai universities. In J. Read (Ed.), Directions in language testing (pp.240-260). Singapore: Singapore University Press.

Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T. L. (2017). A cyclical self-assessment process: Towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1247-1262. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1260091

Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and overview. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance (pp. 1-14). London: Routledge.